Can the statement "Pacifier use causes increased risk of some kind of dental problem." be backed up by any statistics?
I do mean any statistics -- some controlled experiments, sieving through surveys, anything. I'm constantly being told old wives' tales by friends and old doctors' tales by doctors. I'm not asking for well-done science here, just if anybody has investigated anything at all -- any data.
(1)1 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
A study done in 2001 ended with the conclusion:
The study found that prolonged pacifier habits resulted in changes to
the dental arches and the occlusal parameters that were different from
the effects of digit sucking.
This is not to say that the changes to the dental arches were positive or negative, but that there most certainly was an impact. Note that "digit sucking" means thumb sucking.
Another study had similar results:
On the grounds of this study we conclude that prolonged
pacifier-sucking (?2 years) and use of a nursing bottle at night are
risk factors for dental caries in children.
Length of how long pacifier is used matters:
While continuous nonnutritive sucking habits of 48 months or longer
produced the greatest changes in dental arch and occlusal
characteristics, children with shorter sucking durations also had
detectable differences from those with minimal habit durations.
There seem to be no shortage of studies done in this matter.
Read More: informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00016359850142853
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © freshhoot.com2025 All Rights reserved.