Does Dermatitis Herpatiformis have a differential diagnosis?
"Dermatitis herpetiformis (DH), or Duhring's disease,[1][2] is a chronic blistering skin condition,[3] characterised by blisters filled with a watery fluid.[4] Despite its name, DH is neither related to nor caused by herpes virus: the name means that it is a skin inflammation having an appearance similar to herpes.......A connection between DH and celiac disease was recognised in 1967,[5][6] although the exact causal mechanism is not known. DH is a specific manifestation of celiac disease" definition given by Wikipedia en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dermatitis_herpetiformis
For those who do not know, celiac disease is treated by removing gluten from someones diet, and that is when symptoms improve.
This means that the rash is directly or indirectly induced by gluten, as a manifestation of celiac disease.
Are there any other conditions with rashes that resolve when removing gluten from the diet, and recur on reintroduction of gluten, and it being consistent when this process is repeated?
If not, then wouldn't a repeatable correlation between gluten and eruption of this type of rash be diagnostic of celiac disease?
1 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
This is general information about celiac disease and dermatology. For individual diagnosis one must see a physician. A primary care physician is a good option, as they can diagnose celiac disease, it is usually not necessary to see an immunologist or dermatologist.
Dermatitis Herpetiformis does have a differential diagnosis.
First, consider other conditions that could mimick DH like bullous pemphigoid, herpes, uritcaria, eczema, etc.
DH is often confirmed by a biopsy and testing for associated conditions that are suggested by other symptoms.
Even for confirmed DH, however, consider that celiac is not the only disease associated with DH.
UpToDate states that the next most common associated condition is autoimmune thyroid disease, and others include type 1 diabetes, pernicious anemia, vitiligo, Addison's disease, alopecia areata, some other autoimmune diseases, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Remember that correlation does not imply causation - this means that just because they occur together does not mean one causes the other, or that they are certainly caused by the same thing. It just means that there's an increased likelihood of having one of the other conditions.
However, the added time-consistent direct correlation of gluten and the rash would very strongly suggest celiac and make other associations unlikely.
So, is it diagnostic of celiac disease then? Can you definitively rule in or out celiac?
No.
Diagnosing celiac disease incorporates multiple aspects including clinical history, exam, and usually lab testing.
Consider that gluten does not exist in isolation; it is a component along with many other components in certain foods. It is possible, though less likely, to have a skin reaction to a different component in the same food.
This article in a GI Journal states the current recommendation:
...interpretation of serological testing requires consideration of the full clinical scenario.
I have seen some providers consider one feature of celiac disease as clinically diagnostic, and therefore treated as such without necessarily confirming with blood tests: the repeatable correlation of resolution of gastrointestinal symptoms on removal of gluten, and recurrence of symptoms upon reintroduction of gluten.
However, there are other associated recommendations are to do the blood testing to have a more concrete diagnosis. UpToDate recommends:
As a general rule, testing should begin with serologic evaluation. Immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-tissue transglutaminase (TTG) antibody is the single preferred test for detection of celiac disease in individuals over the age of two years.
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © freshhoot.com2026 All Rights reserved.