: I am a 23 yr old looking to open a Roth IRA. Should the fund I choose track the S&P? Not sure what particular funds should be examined, including funds that track the S&P. Is it smart for me at a young age to choose a

Vote Up Vote Down   0 Reactions

Login to give Reaction!

Suggestions:

Know how you feel about winning/losing. Fund choices are just as much an emotional battle as a mental battle. You may know that an index will bounce back, but emotions can easily trump what you know. You would not believe how many people I know sold their index funds in January of 2009. If losing hurts really bad, you may want to allocate some money into something that feels more stable.
Don't believe what someone says just cuz. For instance, most advice advises index funds, which in most cases is true, yet in my case, four out of my 52 mutual fund choices in my 401k have killed the S&P 500 index, Dow Jones index, and Nasdaq index (inception dates over 25 years) even when you include all the fees and loads associated with them (you can get this information). If you don't know how to compare or don't want to, then index funds are your best choice; likewise, if your comparison shows index funds are the best, choose them. Due diligence.
Automating retirement, especially for someone who doesn't want to worry, can be a great way to minimize errors, just make sure you want to. Some companies will offer rebalance tools where you can have funds rebalanced automatically and new money coming in invested automatically. Some example of this here and here, just recall point 2.

Vote Up Vote Down   0 Reactions

Login to give Reaction!

The fund or fund mix you choose should be:

cheap (in terms of both expense ratio and other fees)
risk-heavy, and therefore stock-heavy (probably 100% stocks), because you have a very long time horizon until your retirement and using your risk tolerance will lead to higher returns

(but be aware that if you don't have an emergency fund, the statement about being risk-tolerant is untrue. you should have one first.)

reasonably diversified

Any S&P 500 Index Fund is an excellent way to achieve all three. It would be an excellent place to store your money. Feel free to go ahead and do it. However, there are some other ways to achieve these properties, including:

Target-date retirement funds which will change asset allocation as you near retirement without any further input from you. (Example: Vanguard Target Retirement 2055, VFFVX). If you don't want to think about your asset allocation ever again, put all your retirement money into one of these.
Funds which attempt to invest in the entire stock market, including stocks outside the S&P500 (e.g. Vanguard Total Stock Market Index, VSTAX) or even stocks outside the US (e.g. Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund, VTWSX). These are a little riskier, a little better diversified, and will probably end up with better returns over the next several decades.

Note. I have identified three Vanguard funds because I know they are cheap. You are certainly welcome to seek other funds, using Research. You would also be well-advised to validate for yourself that these funds actually meet your needs, also using Research.

Vote Up Vote Down   0 Reactions

Login to give Reaction!

Over the long term, expense is a killer. An index fund that has a sub .10% is going to outperform a similar fund over time, if that fund has a high expense.

My answer will ignore some important things, like asset allocation.
At 23, with a 00 Roth limit, a few years deposits in a low cost S&P fund isn't a bad way to start. K or so later, you can start on a path to diversification.

In my opinion, Target date funds are a bit of a gimmick. Do the math, VFFVX sports a .18% per year expense vs VOO, the .05% S&P ETF. Over 40 years, the .05% will cost you 2% vs 7% for the .18% expense. This may not seem like much now, but when you are 60 and your retirement accounts are north of M, that's a difference of 0K.